[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk***Subject**:**Re: Cyrillic in math****From**:*alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)***Date**: Thu, 19 Aug 93 17:12 BST

>i might think your argument has substance if you can show me *any* >way of getting a bold upright gamma. With the proposed new math font encoding, and with a bold MC font loaded, you'll get it by typing $\bf\uprightgamma$. If the macro writer wishes to, they can define \gamma to be \uprightgamma rather than \slantedgamma, in which case the input is $\bf\gamma$. That looks reasonably `fixed' to me! Alan.

**References**:**Re: Cyrillic in math***From:*sozueh@rpi.edu

- Prev by Date:
**Re: the Powerset Symbol** - Next by Date:
**\opm and \omp** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Cyrillic in math** - Next by thread:
**nabla, laplace, d'alembert** - Index(es):