Taylor, P P.Taylor at
Tue Oct 15 17:07:01 CEST 2019

Norbert Preining wrote:

On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Taylor, P wrote:
No other changes, but seriously worse rendering of the Tibetan IMHO.

That looks indeed much worse, but are you sure it is the same input? It
shows *two* "u" subscripts, which is surprising.

Absolutely the same input, Norbert :  I made only a three/four/three character change in the file ("ans" -> "erif" -> "ans") and observed the output change.  The relevant lines of code are :

\newfontface \tibetan [Color=text-colour, Language=Tibetan, Script=Tibetan] {Noto Serif Tibetan Bold}

\def \Tibetan #1{{\tibetan #1}}

Üdvözlet ~ % Hungarian

ཕེབས་པར་དགའ་བསུ་ཞུ། ~ % Tibetan

Fàilte ~ % Scottish Gaelic

style characters={ཕེབས་པར་དགའ་བསུ་ཞུ།} with {character command=\Tibetan},

The first two are lines 24 \& 36, the latter lines 68–70 and 241, so there is a very small probability that I might have inadvertently amended the latter while intending to amend the former.

** Phil.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the tex-live mailing list