Aleph
Taylor, P
P.Taylor at rhul.ac.uk
Tue Oct 15 17:07:01 CEST 2019
Norbert Preining wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Taylor, P wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t40sik54ugshhni/involute-gold-gamma.pdf?dl=0
No other changes, but seriously worse rendering of the Tibetan IMHO.
That looks indeed much worse, but are you sure it is the same input? It
shows *two* "u" subscripts, which is surprising.
Absolutely the same input, Norbert : I made only a three/four/three character change in the file ("ans" -> "erif" -> "ans") and observed the output change. The relevant lines of code are :
\newfontface \tibetan [Color=text-colour, Language=Tibetan, Script=Tibetan] {Noto Serif Tibetan Bold}
\def \Tibetan #1{{\tibetan #1}}
Üdvözlet ~ % Hungarian
ཕེབས་པར་དགའ་བསུ་ཞུ། ~ % Tibetan
Fàilte ~ % Scottish Gaelic
style characters={ཕེབས་པར་དགའ་བསུ་ཞུ།} with {character command=\Tibetan},
The first two are lines 24 \& 36, the latter lines 68–70 and 241, so there is a very small probability that I might have inadvertently amended the latter while intending to amend the former.
** Phil.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/attachments/20191015/20b2e1d1/attachment.html>
More information about the tex-live
mailing list