[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binary Relations, draft 1
- To: Hans Aberg <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Binary Relations, draft 1
- From: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: email@example.com
- Content-Length: 842
> But this does not explain why Berthold's extrapolation as philosophical
He probably is a top-grade philosopher too but that was not my meaning.
I was contrasting "Aberg's extrapolation" with Y&Y's, which was:
I think the reason (if any) to make the distinction of setting these upright
is that they are mulitletter combinations rather than that they are functions.
This helps distinquish `sin' from the product of s, i, and n.
Y&Y, Inc. mailto:support@YandY.com http://www.YandY.com
He also pointed out, very wisely, that this discussion has rambled far
too far from anything relevant to taco's work or even to the Unicode
> I am interested to know the theoretical foundation of this new
> philosophical principle you mention. :-)
Ah yes, every generation needs its new philosophy.