[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>***Subject**:**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1****From**:*Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>***Date**: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 18:26:39 +0100**Cc**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk*- Content-Length: 923

At 16:46 +0000 1998/11/19, Chris Rowley wrote: >I was contrasting "Aberg's extrapolation" with Y&Y's, which was: > > I think the reason (if any) to make the distinction of setting these upright > is that they are mulitletter combinations rather than that they are >functions. > This helps distinquish `sin' from the product of s, i, and n. Which does not work out in contemporary mathematics, because there are typeset both upright and slanted/italics multiletter and single letter math names. >He also pointed out, very wisely, that this discussion has rambled far >too far from anything relevant to taco's work or even to the Unicode >submission. So here is a chance for you to lead the way... :-) Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:haberg@member.ams.org> * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/> * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1** - Next by Date:
**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1** - Next by thread:
**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1** - Index(es):