[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \bigplus ?
- To: Joerg.Knappen@uni-mainz.de
- Subject: Re: \bigplus ?
- From: bbeeton <BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 15:08:27 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, bnb@MATH.AMS.ORG
j"org knappen asks
Is there still too much space in the layout for big symbols left?
is there, by chance, a postscript file of the mx1 chart, that i
could just print out? in fact, all the charts ... and a list
with the \csnames ...
i'm working on a symbol identification project right now, and it
would be useful to compare what i've got with the complement that
you've put together. i know that the fonts were posted earlier,
but i haven't got time to install them, because i'm on a very
tight deadline. and i want to make sure i don't miss anything.
(i will gladly feed back what i've got that isn't in the m*
i've used justin ziegler's paper already for reference, but a lot
has happened since then.
i will be attending eurotex, and bringing the results of my project
with me, although not presenting a paper. i'm hoping there will be
at least a bof on math fonts, and maybe a more serious working party.
i will have some interesting news to share that i can't divulge yet.