[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \bigplus ?
- To: C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: \bigplus ?
- From: Joerg.Knappen@uni-mainz.de
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 20:54:07 +0100
> Since we already have added \bigtimes to MX1, it seems logical
> to `complete the square' of \times/\bigtimes \plus/\bigplus.
Make it a rectangle by throwing in
\bigboxplus and \bigboxtimes.
\bigboxplus is established notation, as I have learnt. \bigboxtimes is here
for symmetry and foreseeing the requests to come.
Is there still too much space in the layout for big symbols left?