[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk***Subject**:**Re: cmex: a draft.****From**:*alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)***Date**: Thu, 12 Aug 93 22:22 BST

>It seems pretty clear, that the NEXTLARGER mechanism for selecting >displaystyle versions of larger operators is just a hack used by Knuth I'm not so sure about this, since I'm not convinced that a 14pt \textstyle\int is the same as a 10pt \displaystyle\int. The shapes of the two glyphs are actually quite distinct, more than I'd expect from optically correcting for the change of design size. I'll have to compare the 7pt \displaystyle\int with the 10pt \textstyle\int... Alan.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: cmex: a draft.***From:*bbeeton <BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG>

**References**:**Re: cmex: a draft.***From:*Michael Downes <MJD@MATH.AMS.ORG>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: cmex: a draft.** - Next by Date:
**Re: Punctuation** - Prev by thread:
**Re: cmex: a draft.** - Next by thread:
**Re: cmex: a draft.** - Index(es):