[texhax] What program can I use to edit TeX files?
davidcrosswell at internode.on.net
Fri Mar 22 16:55:28 CET 2013
On 23/03/13 01:20, Uwe Lück wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 14:01 -0400 schrieb Steven Pisano:
>> Barbara, Thomas:
I use it for other work and it handles just about anything.
>> Thank you so much for your input, and helping along a newbie.
>> Here is a sample file (.txt) I edited (along with original ".tex" file).
>> Without being specific, the publisher told me I could not give them
>> a "txt" file because "characters will not appear correctly in ASCII format."
> I see that actually a mistake happened, rev-1.tex.txt has question
> marks where in 1.tex are quotation marks.
> It is correct that you should not send ASCII files.
> But ASCII is not the same as plain text.
> ASCII means that only (at most) the first 128 "characters"
> are preserved. The more recent ISO-8859 encodings preserve
> (almost) 256 characters. They suffice for "Latin" alphabets,
> especially they can handle many accents, currency symbols, ...
> that cannot be encoded by ASCII.
> The standard today is to encode much more than 256 characters,
> by Unicode. With the standard UTF-8 encoding, in general one
> character cannot be represented by a single byte.
> This is a difficulty for certain TeX versions,
> some care is needed to deal with 2-byte characters.
> But still it is plain text, and .tex files are plain text files.
> You should not make .tex.txt files. This is may be a difficulty
> with Word: saving "as plain text" what Word internally handles
> as something binary, and then that funny program adds the
> .txt extension.
> You should simply edit the .tex files, without changing their
> names, at least keep the extension .tex.
>> So, all "wars" aside, what I guess I need to know is that if Word
>> could inadvertently introduce artifacts that would prevent or interfere
>> with TeX compiling the file correctly, all I need to use is a bare bones
>> editor that will enable me to give a ".tex" file back to the publisher.
> There are probably ways to avoid such mistakes with Word,
> and mistakes can happen with plain text editors as well.
> I would just say that Word is too heavy for the task.
> A plain text editor usually does not change the encoding,
> but I have experienced difficulties with that.
> Especially, I just had an experience where I received ISO-8859
> files, while my editor by default saves as UTF-8. This actually
> broke the TeX runs. The text editor I used for this task is in
> my view not very helpful about encodings, but I found a way.
> I needed a trick to corroborate my suspicion that the original
> encoding was 1-byte and that I should keep 1-byte encoding.
> The fogging editor allowed saving "as ISO 8859-15" as an
> alternative to UTF-8. That was OK, although the encoding
> probably was ISO 8859-1 and the editor displayed some symbols
> wrongly. I just needed to save "in 1-byte mode".
> That was just a story, it was on Linux. If you are on Windows,
> I cannot tell you much, have not worked with it for some years.
> You might just try Notepad and first clarify its behaviour
> with encodings on examples, we might help here about that.
>> I am not creating dvi files. I am not 'typesetting' the book.
>> I am only doing "language editing," not actually editing the equations
> Then I would consider it bad to get an entire TeX installation.
> But it would be good if you had an editor with TeX syntax highlighting.
> The terrible gedit that I used here on Ubuntu-Linux at least is
> great in that it provides TeX syntax highlighting without requiring
> a TeX installation. Maybe you can find something similar,
> maybe you could switch to Linux, it is not so difficult today!
> You could simply, as I have done, buy a little laptop and install
> Linux on it, as an alternative to the computer you mainly use.
> This may be easier than learning how to choose the operating
> system while booting or create hard disk partitions for different
> operating systems.
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> Mailing list archives: http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/
> More links: http://tug.org/begin.html
> Automated subscription management: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
> Human mailing list managers: postmaster at tug.org
"Res publica non dominetur."
More information about the texhax