preining at logic.at
Tue Oct 15 16:50:11 CEST 2019
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
> luatex only. Moreover, Devanagari is in luatex broken again and I am
Yes, Devanagari and Tibetan are very similar (obviously from the
history), to they share the same problems.
You say that you would expect harfbuzz to work correctly, but I don't
see that this is actually the case.
Do you know what LibreOffice is using? Because LibreOffice correctly
displays the complicated ligature I send back then when using the fonts
(and some others), while with Noto Sans Tibetan it is broken.
The attached PDF is generated from LibreOffice with some fonts I have at
It shows that LibreOffice is indeed capable of correctly rendering the
complicated ligature, which none of lua(hb)tex nor xetex could render.
Though I have no idea what is the reason for that!
PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 75038 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the tex-live