[tex-live] bibtex apalike.tex/.sty

Reinhard Kotucha reinhard.kotucha at web.de
Thu Oct 27 21:32:00 CEST 2016


On 2016-10-27 at 11:35:52 +0200, Siep Kroonenberg wrote:

 > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:18:58PM +0200, texlive at schoepfer.info wrote:
 > > Hi,
 > > 
 > > in the package bibtex, i think
 > > apalike.tex and apalike.sty should move from docfiles -> runfiles
 > > 
 > > While looking through the docs, here and there one finds .doc-files.
 > > It feels a bit strange and pointless to me to use a another/proprietary
 > > format for tex-documentation. Btw, only about 0.25% of all
 > > documentation-files are .doc-files
 > > 
 > > Johannes
 > 
 > Long ago, emtex used the .doc extension for plain text
 > documentation. This is at least the case with
 > texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/germbib/apalike.doc.


$ cd texmd-dist/doc
$ find . -type f | wc -l
31622
find . -name "*.doc" | wc -l
91
$ find . -name "*.doc" -exec file {} \; | grep -i 'microsoft.*word' | wc -l
2
$ find . -name "*.doc" -exec file {} \; | grep -v text | grep -vi 'microsoft.*word'
./upmendex/upmendex.doc: LaTeX raw index file, 
./latex/dccpaper/ijdc-v9.doc: LaTeX auxiliary file, 
./latex/dccpaper/idcc.doc: LaTeX auxiliary file, 

Only 2 out of 31622 files (0.0063247%) are M$-Word documents and
I suppose that the authors just forgot to convert them to PDF.

Regards,
  Reinhard


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha                            Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover                    mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
------------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the tex-live mailing list