[tex-live] scheme modern
Robin Fairbairns
Robin.Fairbairns at cl.cam.ac.uk
Sun Jan 9 00:10:12 CET 2011
Martin Schröder <martin at oneiros.de> wrote:
> 2011/1/8 C.M. Connelly <cmc at math.hmc.edu>:
> > To be called ``TeX'', an implementation has to pass a series of
> > tests (trip for TeX, trap for Metafont), which implies a
> > definition of a binary's functionality:
>
> Well, I believe pdftex could be made to pass the test. :-)
how's that going to help someone who claims a "religious" attachment to
don's code?
More information about the tex-live
mailing list