[tex-live] scheme modern
C.M. Connelly
cmc at math.hmc.edu
Sat Jan 8 23:06:19 CET 2011
"PT" == Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk>
PT> Martin Schröder wrote:
>> And I have strong (religous) complains about any TeX
>> distribution without the tex binary as defined by DEK. :-)
PT> Did he define a binary, Martin ? I thought he only
PT> defined the source code.
To be called ``TeX'', an implementation has to pass a series of
tests (trip for TeX, trap for Metafont), which implies a
definition of a binary's functionality:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=triptrap
Claire
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Claire M. Connelly cmc at math.hmc.edu
System Administrator, Dept. of Mathematics, Harvey Mudd College
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/attachments/20110108/8ec627c2/attachment.bin>
More information about the tex-live
mailing list