[tex-live] libertine wrongly packaged

Bob Tennent rdt at cs.queensu.ca
Mon Dec 19 03:51:27 CET 2011

 >| >|That would be ok in principle, but aren't there conflicts between
 >| the two?
 >|Mostly the files that shouldn't even be in the new package. The package
 >|now at CTAN has *just* otfs, some support files in tex/latex/libertine
 >|and documentation. There seems to be some overlap among the latter
 >|two but this can surely be dealt with by changing "libertine" to
 >|"libertine-otf" or "libertine-type1".

Actually there seem to be 4 files that are in both:


The files contain \DeclareTextGlyphY commands. They are included
by libertine.sty (when the processor is xetex or luatex) or by
libertineotf.sty in the new package. The respective files in the two
packages differ. But if the files in the "legacy" package were re-named,
say, fxluni_legacy.inc etc. and the corresponding \input commands in
libertine.sty revised accordingly, I believe the two packages could

Bob T.

More information about the tex-live mailing list