[tex-live] groff.enc gone in TL2010 since today

[Reinhard Kotucha]

On 2011-04-07 at 18:00:07 +0200, Marcus Frings wrote:

 > Hello,
 > 
 > I posted this 
 > 
 > > since today's update from TL2010 my document doesn't compile anymore
 > > because it can't find groff.enc in the system. Well, in fact the whole
 > > directory foo/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dvips/groff/ is missing now. I fixed
 > > it by extracting groff.enc from groff.r15878.tar.xz (from the backup).
 > 
 > in comp.text.tex a few minutes ago and I was told to report it as bug
 > to the TL team. I hope this is the right place. :-) If not, please point
 > me to the right direction. In any case, please CC me because I'm not
 > subscribed to the list. :-)

I did an update today too:

[3/47] auto-remove: groff
The following files should be removed due to the removal of groff,
but are part of another package, too.
 texmf-dist/fonts/afm/groff/freeeuro.afm - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/afm/groff/psyrgo.afm - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/afm/groff/zpzdr-reversed.afm - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dvips/groff/groff.enc - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/map/dvips/groff/troff-updmap.map - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/map/dvips/groff/troff.map - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/groff/freeeuro.tfm - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/groff/psyrgo.tfm - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/groff/zpzdr-reversed.tfm - metapost
 texmf-dist/fonts/type1/groff/freeeuro.pfa - metapost

...and later...

[24/47, 00:36/01:12] update: metapost [2300k] (21346 -> 22014) ... done

...and now:

$ kpsewhich groff.enc
/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dvips/metapost/groff.enc

Could you check whether the file is now in the metapost directory?

Regards,
  Reinhard

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha                                      Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover                              mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------