[tex-live] use of x86_64-darwin only in mactex 2010
Justin C. Walker
justin at mac.com
Sun Jun 20 20:48:25 CEST 2010
On Jun 20, 2010, at 10:54 , Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Victor Ivrii wrote:
>
>> One can complain a bit that MacTeX installs x86_64-darwin binaries
>> on
>> SL even if it is not 64-bit machine capable (as my intel
>> pre-Core-Duo-2 MacBookPro)
>
> One /should/ complain about that. I'm copying the mactex list to make
> sure that Dick sees this, since I thought he was going to check
> hardware compatibility.
I don't want to make too much of this, but there are a couple of
issues to consider:
- it may provide a (slight) savings of space to full universal
binaries (ppc, i386, x86_64) full universal binaries (ppc, i386,
x86_64). Maybe default is to install the universal binaries, with an
option to select a specific architecture ("lipo" can thin them down).
Once it's figured out, it's just a push of a button :-}
- some folk may have a bootable drive that they use on multiple
systems. Having "64-bit only" being the only option will screw that up.
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
-----------
I'm beginning to like the cut of his jibberish.
-----------
More information about the tex-live
mailing list