[tex-live] your eqexam package

Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk
Fri Jul 9 10:23:55 CEST 2010


I can only second Staszek's wise words.
** Phil.
--------
Staszek Wawrykiewicz wrote:

 > Ahhh... really pity. For me those packages are the pearls! And all macros
 > are signed LPPL anyway. We have so many packages without doc sources
 > (like fonts or context), so I still cannot understand why we have such
 > restrictions. I dare swear that for open source packages
 > we use too much restrictions, or, hmmm... how to say, political
 > (american :) correctness. All in all:
 > - the program, macro, font IS open source;
 > - why we cannot give freedom to the developers to add (also freely
 > distributable and readable) the documentation, which is not real,
 > workable part of the package itself?
 >
 >>>> I believe we went over this before, all my manuals are written with
 >> YandY
 >>>> TeX, with my own special macros and fonts. A person would not be
 >>>> able to
 >>>> compile the document from its source, so what's the point.
 >
 > Just the case, as Don Story kindly explained.
 >
 > All the best,
 >
 > ----
 > Staszek Wawrykiewicz
 > staw at gust.org.pl


More information about the tex-live mailing list