[tex-live] urw fonts

[cfrees at imapmail.org]

On Sun 26th Oct, 2008 at 21:35, Reinhard Kotucha seems to have written:

> Dr. Clea F. Rees writes:
> > Is the following correct?
> >  	My TL tree contains two copies of the readme for the URW Base
> >  	35 fonts: .../texmf-dist/doc/fonts/antiqua/README.base35 and
> >  	.../texmf-dist/doc/fonts/grotesq/README.base35. But neither
> >  	antiqua nor grotesq are part of urw-base35 according to either
> >  	CTAN or the README.base35 itself.
> > It seems unnecessarily confusing, anyway, and it is not obvious where
> > to look for documentation for the fonts which are part of urw-base35.
>
> But they are there:
>
>  texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/antiqua/uaqr8ac.pfb
>  texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/grotesq/ugqb8a.pfb

Yes. But they're not part of urw-base35 so README.base35 shouldn't be
in their doc directories. It should be e.g. readme.antiqua and
antiqua.txt (or uaq.txt as it seems to be on CTAN).

- cfr

>
> Documentation:
>
>  texmf-dist/doc/fonts/antiqua/antiqua.txt
>  texmf-dist/doc/fonts/grotesq/grotesq.txt
>
> Regards,
>  Reinhard
>
>