[tex-live] License auditing: Consequences

Martin Schröder martin at oneiros.de
Wed Sep 6 21:30:58 CEST 2006

2006/9/6, David Kastrup <dak at gnu.org>:
> Since Debian does not view documentation separately from software, it
> is not surprising that they don't consider GFDL free.

The pdfTeX manual is currently licensed under the GFDL (it seemed a
good idea then). What are the preferred alternatives? Not GPL or BSD,


More information about the tex-live mailing list