[tex-live] teTeX: no next release
Frank Küster
frank at kuesterei.ch
Wed May 31 19:14:17 CEST 2006
Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:22:01AM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> The intention was provide a way for addon packages and updates to be
>> installed. As an RPM should never own any file in /usr/local (where RH
>> puts TEXMFLOCAL)
>
> Why not? Is any layout document somewhere which specifies such
> restriction? 'rpm' itself defintely does not have such limitation.
The Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard:
,---- http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEUSRHIERARCHY
| The following directories, or symbolic links to directories, are
| required in /usr.
|
| Directory Description
| [...]
| local Local hierarchy (empty after main installation)
`----
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
More information about the tex-live
mailing list