[tex-live] back to heresy

Sebastian Rahtz sebastian.rahtz at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Wed Jun 30 09:53:13 CEST 2004

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:34:52AM +0200, Staszek Wawrykiewicz wrote:
> I've compared scheme-basic.scheme and scheme-minimal.scheme
> (btw why we need ".scheme" suffix in lists/ ? ;-).
its a mystery :-}

> It could be somehow missleading for the user.
> scheme-minimal contains e.g. metapost, but without base macros even .mem
> cannot be made.

so, please, help me correct it. what package has base MP macros?

> When removing from the scheme-basic collection-doc-english (and
> collection-context), we can have quite the same result as for
> scheme-minimal, but more complete and working.

but basic is cluttered up with things like metafont :-}

> Anyway such setup can be
> used only for English documents

because of hyphenation, you mean? thats true of "basic" too

>so it should be stated in description
> field and in the documentation.

please edit it for me...


More information about the tex-live mailing list