[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fontinst-1.8 release
- To: s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk
- Subject: Re: fontinst-1.8 release
- From: Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 13:23:49 +0200
- CC: fontinst@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- In-reply-to: <7040-Tue30Jun1998113236+0100-s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk> (messagefrom Sebastian Rahtz on Tue, 30 Jun 1998 11:32:36 +0100)
>> Both packages use different font names, but some of the family
>> names and fd file names are the same, so it's not recommended to
>> install both
> sadly, that means that the PSNFSS is going to have to stay with the
> old one only. I cannot risk a deluge of complaints. Cannot mathptmx
> be made entirely independent?
It could, if you have a good suggestion for a family name. The
problem is that I was running out of meaningful names and that LaTeX
allows no more than 5 characters per family name to ensure that .fd
file names don't execeed 8 characters. What else but "ptmcm" could
we use for mathptmx? I would have prefered a z-prefix (i.e. zptmcm
or zcmptm) but that would make it too long, I'm afraid. Appending
an x-suffix might be misleading, since it's not an expert font.
Any ideas?
Cheers, Ulrik.