[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Typesetting rules in physics
- To: "Y&Y Inc." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Typesetting rules in physics
- From: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 17:01:35 +0100 (MET)
- Cc: Michael John Downes <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Content-Length: 939
» Can we hear from someone who has been around the typesetting world
» long enough to know whether bold italic was rare in any of the various
» older technologies such as photo/film, mechanical typesetting machines etc.
i'm certainly not that person, but if you browse any font catalog,
you'll see that classic fonts were typically available as 3 companions
(regular, italic & bold) : Garamond 3, Granjon as examples.
The reason being that bold was not used in text, only for titles, where
italic was not used. Like in the case of greek, i'm pretty sure that
printers simply used what they had: they were not going to buy a whole
font for the sake of the coherence in few scientific
publications. Bold italic was invented more recently (but long before
the advent of e-publishing, anyway, and was already available at the
hot composition era, as Century (1894) shows -- but rather in press
works than book).
Thierry Bouche, Grenoble.