[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>***Subject**:**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1****From**:*Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>***Date**: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 14:30:10 +0100 (MET)- Content-Length: 498

» P.S. Why are we discussing all this? I thought we've been through » all of it sometime last year. Obviously for fun. » Probably the only conclusion we can » find is that we a need a complete set of Latin/Greek uc/lc alphabets » in as many styles we can get, including upright, italics, » bold upright, bold italics, bold sans, bold sans inclined, ... As for TeX maths fonts, yes, as already asserted by Berthold. But does this make sense in the Unicode context? Thierry Bouche, Grenoble.

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Mathematical typesetting principles** - Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematical typesetting principles** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1** - Next by thread:
**Unicode mathematical control characters** - Index(es):