[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk***Subject**:**Re: Stix & math glyphs****From**:*Laurent Siebenmann <lcs@topo.math.u-psud.fr>***Date**: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 04:17:24 +0200

As Barbara says: http://www.w3.org/Math/pdf/mathchars.pdf is now OK. Does a square surrounding a glyph mean that it is satisfactorily represented in the CM fonts? Better grubby glyphs than none at all. On the other hand, there are an efficient ways to keep in vectorized form isolated characters extracted from zillions of fonts without keeping the zillions of fonts at hand. Pop them into Illustrator; convert to PS outline and then include as an EPSF. Like STIX this does NOT imply use of TeX. Cheers, Larry S

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Stix & math glyphs** - Next by Date:
**Re: Stix & math glyphs** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Stix & math glyphs** - Next by thread:
**Re: Stix & math glyphs** - Index(es):