[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comments on 0.59
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: comments on 0.59
- From: Matthias Clasen <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 16:26:53 +0200
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> What was the problem? Should I prepare a new patch or should
> I supply a new version of files?
A patch should be fine.
> > It is obvious that you know more about the parametrisation of cm
> > than me.
> Well, not that much actually. Just the explanation of the parameters
> from the introduction to Volume E. AFAIK, crisp is the diameter of
> serif corners. With crisp=0 (in cmr) you get sharp corners, while
> positive crisp (in cmmi) produces slghtly softer, rounded corners.
That is the difference: I have never seen volume E.
> > Thanks. I you could afford the time to create a patch containing stuff
> > which I missed/misapplied would be helpful. I'm obviously not very good
> > at this. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> I wonder if there is a problem with sending patches directly by mail.
> I've seen some patches which got messed up, for some reason, but you
> should have gotten a clear warning or error mesage in such cases.
No. There were no problems with the patches per se. If I remember correctly,
your MX1 patches didn't apply, because I had done changes to the same files.
Institut fuer Mathematik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg