[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>, Maths Fonts Discussion list <math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk>***Subject**:**Re: revised report of EuroTeX math font BOF****From**:*"Y&Y, Inc." <support@YandY.com>***Date**: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 06:38:52 -0400

At 11:13 AM 98/04/15 +0200, Thierry Bouche wrote: >i'm very pessimistic about what could be a `plain tex interface' as a >typical plain tex file may contain things like {\textfont0\char124} or >\mathchardef\decimalsep\if@french"013B\else"013A\fi For what it is worth, we supply LucidaBright and MathTime fonts with plain TeX and LaTeX 2.09 support as well. Some people use them that way. But is true that the probability of running into hard-coded OT1 assumptions (or worse) is higher. But note that this happens with some `LaTeX 2e' code as well... Regards, Berthold.

- Prev by Date:
**Re: revised report of EuroTeX math font BOF** - Next by Date:
**Re: revised report of EuroTeX math font BOF** - Prev by thread:
**Re: revised report of EuroTeX math font BOF** - Next by thread:
**Re: revised report of EuroTeX math font BOF** - Index(es):