[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rsfs slant problems
- To: Laurent Siebenmann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: rsfs slant problems
- From: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:26:28 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: email@example.com
Laurent wrote --
> Some clarification please.
> bb> - although rare, some bold cursive letters are sometimes requested;
> > normal weight must be distinguishable from bold
> ls> Well, there is only one sort of bold that should be provided,
> > namely a bold for mathematics in bold titles. If you accept this,
> cr> Unfortunately this is not acceptable. whether or not it makes
> >typographic sense, it is a `true math bold' that is needed here.
> I am sorry Chris, I do not understand what you are trying to say.
> Please explain.
> I distinguish two distinct purposes for "bold"ness for math.
> I am suggesting the "titlebold"ness should be attended to first
> not last.
OK, I thought you were saying that only titlebold is needed.
> ls> On the other hand, Knuth's "skew
> > character" trickery could I believe be extended to solve these problems in
> > some future e-TeX. This is a hint for Mathias Classen and friends.
> cr> I belive such ideas are already being experimented on.
> Can you be more precise?
Not immediately: maybe "friends" can be:-)?