[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Laurent Siebenmann <lcs@topo.math.u-psud.fr>***Subject**:**Re: rsfs slant problems****From**:*bbeeton <BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG>***Date**: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:31:45 -0500 (EST)**Cc**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk*

larry has commented on bold script/cursive: Well, there is only one sort of bold that should be provided, namely a bold for mathematics in bold titles. ... ams convention does *not* ordinarily embolden math in titles, as there is too often a distinction between bold and lightface. however, we *have* had occasional requests for bold script letters as a contrast to the same letters in lightface in the same document. that is *our* reason for requiring boldface script. as i said in my list of desiderata, - although rare, some bold cursive letters are sometimes requested; normal weight must be distinguishable from bold -- bb

- Prev by Date:
**Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS** - Next by Date:
**Re: rsfs slant problems** - Prev by thread:
**Re: rsfs slant problems** - Next by thread:
**Re: rsfs slant problems** - Index(es):