[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*lcs@topo.math.u-psud.fr, math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk***Subject**:**Re: rsfs slant problems****From**:*Laurent Siebenmann <lcs@topo.math.u-psud.fr>***Date**: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:08:48 +0100

Chris! Some clarification please. bb> - although rare, some bold cursive letters are sometimes requested; > normal weight must be distinguishable from bold ls> Well, there is only one sort of bold that should be provided, > namely a bold for mathematics in bold titles. If you accept this, cr> Unfortunately this is not acceptable. whether or not it makes >typographic sense, it is a `true math bold' that is needed here. I am sorry Chris, I do not understand what you are trying to say. Please explain. I distinguish two distinct purposes for "bold"ness for math. I am suggesting the "titlebold"ness should be attended to first not last. ----------------------- ls> On the other hand, Knuth's "skew > character" trickery could I believe be extended to solve these problems in > some future e-TeX. This is a hint for Mathias Classen and friends. cr> I belive such ideas are already being experimented on. Can you be more precise? ------------------------ Cheers Larry Siebenmann

- Prev by Date:
**Re: rsfs slant problems** - Next by Date:
**Re: rsfs slant problems** - Prev by thread:
**Re: rsfs slant problems** - Next by thread:
**Re: rsfs slant problems** - Index(es):