[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rsfs slant problems
- To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: rsfs slant problems
- From: Laurent Siebenmann <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:08:48 +0100
Some clarification please.
bb> - although rare, some bold cursive letters are sometimes requested;
> normal weight must be distinguishable from bold
ls> Well, there is only one sort of bold that should be provided,
> namely a bold for mathematics in bold titles. If you accept this,
cr> Unfortunately this is not acceptable. whether or not it makes
>typographic sense, it is a `true math bold' that is needed here.
I am sorry Chris, I do not understand what you are trying to say.
I distinguish two distinct purposes for "bold"ness for math.
I am suggesting the "titlebold"ness should be attended to first
ls> On the other hand, Knuth's "skew
> character" trickery could I believe be extended to solve these problems in
> some future e-TeX. This is a hint for Mathias Classen and friends.
cr> I belive such ideas are already being experimented on.
Can you be more precise?