[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 12:45:04 GMT
- Cc: support@YandY.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Ulrik Vieth writes:
> I suppose it may depend on which fonts Elsevier is actually using
> in their books and journals. If they are using MathTime and the
> corresponding Script font, there is certainly no need to use RSFS
> for Script. If they are using CM, things might be different.
i don't know, actually. I dont *think* any of our typesetters use CM or
MathTime, except maybe those few that use TeX.
> It might also depend on whether authors of scientific papers really
> have a say in which fonts the publisher chooses, and whether they
> are actually offered a choice between Script and Calligraphic.
good lord, what an idea...
but thats the point. our SGML tags stuff as <sc>...</sc>, ie no
different calligraphic. how its printed is typographic detail.
i was thinking less of the RSFS font than the extra symbols.