[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inverted (=reflected) N
- To: "Y&Y, Inc." <support@YandY.com>
- Subject: Re: Inverted (=reflected) N
- From: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 18:22:36 GMT
- Resent-From: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Resent-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> (1) It may be worth using the glyph names in
> Lucida Sans Unicode, where they exist (of course, UNICODE
> doesn't cover all the math glyphs you want, but quite a few...).
I do not see much point in spending time on discussing such things; but
this is surely only one of many possibilities.
> (2) Glyph names aren't quite arbitrary. Some software figures out
> the appropriate UNICODE number using a fixed table of
> glyph names (ATM for NT being the prime example).
This sounds very worrying but perhaps I misunderstand it.
Hence some questions:
where does ATM find the names to look up in its arbitrary (I assume)
what does it do with the number it finds in the table?