[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*"Y&Y, Inc." <support@YandY.com>***Subject**:**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N****From**:*Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>***Date**: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 18:22:36 GMT- Resent-From: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Resent-To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk

> > (1) It may be worth using the glyph names in > Lucida Sans Unicode, where they exist (of course, UNICODE > doesn't cover all the math glyphs you want, but quite a few...). I do not see much point in spending time on discussing such things; but this is surely only one of many possibilities. > > (2) Glyph names aren't quite arbitrary. Some software figures out > the appropriate UNICODE number using a fixed table of > glyph names (ATM for NT being the prime example). This sounds very worrying but perhaps I misunderstand it. Hence some questions: where does ATM find the names to look up in its arbitrary (I assume) fixed table? what does it do with the number it finds in the table? chris

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Next by Date:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Next by thread:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Index(es):