[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk***Subject**:**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N****From**:*Matthias Clasen <clasen@tetris.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>***Date**: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 00:05:35 +0100**Cc**:*BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG, tech-support@MATH.AMS.ORG, math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk*

> > > > i think this would probably be a good occasion to impose some uniformity > > on this notation. proposal: > > - Xinv -- inverted top-to-bottom > > - Xrefl -- mirrored left-to-right > > - Xrot -- rotated 180\deg so that the top is now the bottom, etc. > > I would be happy with those names: of course, for letters with some > symmetry (eg N, A, E) two of these names will both be applicable to > the same glyph. Thus one also needs some precedence rule to get a > canonical name. {See, I can still apply some of that group theory:-) > Yes, would probably be an improvement. But if you want to apply group theory, why not use inv*refl=rot and drop rot :-) Matthias

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Next by Date:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Next by thread:
**Re: Inverted (=reflected) N** - Index(es):