[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk***Subject**:**Re: Mathematica font problems****From**:*Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>***Date**: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:48:21 +0100

Ulrik Vieth: > Could it be that the code downloaded with the Mathematica fonts > somehow erased the /TeXDict definition, and if so whose fault is that? > I never had such a problem with other download fonts, nor with the > previous version of the Mathematica fonts shipped with Mma 3.0. Thierry Bouche: > well, wolfram say that these fonts allow to lpr them so that they be > resident in the printer memory. (and that they should be used this > way.) So my opinion is that there is a small PS programm doing things > to the system dictionnary of the printer within the fonts. If removed, > they should embeddable again. I guess I found the guilty part by comparing the old and new versions of the Mma fonts. Each fonts now starts with a header that looks like %!PS-AdobeFont-1.0: Math1 001.000 ! %%CreationDate: 1/31/97 at 11:59 AM ! %%VMusage: 1024 32924 [...] %%EndComments + 0 serverdict begin exitserver FontDirectory/Math1 known{/Math1 findfont dup ... I guess it must be the line 0 serverdict begin exitserver that erases whatever else has been defined in "tex.pro" before sending the embedded fonts. Somehow this must have a different effect under GhostScript than on a real printer. Hope this explains it (sort of). Cheers, Ulrik.

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Mathematica font problems** - Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematica font problems** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Mathematica font problems** - Next by thread:
**Re: Mathematica font problems** - Index(es):