[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MF hackery (arrow kit)

> > * Made `all bigops should have small counterparts, but not necessarily
> >   vice versa' true (also from the archives).
> Do we really need this?  We already have slots for small integrals.
> Do you also want small \sum and \prod?  Why nout use \Sigma and \Pi?

Well, I should have said this more clearly: They should have a binop 
counterpart. So the `small \sum' is already there, its the `+'.
Regards, Matthias