[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about EuroTeX (again)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: about EuroTeX (again)
- From: Matthias Clasen <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 09:31:51 +0200
Thanks a lot for the abstract, Ulrik. I think it is very good and doesn't need
any additions. As to the outline of the paper:
> \item Introduction / Motivation / Timeline
I would appreciate proposals for this part.
> \item Review of the old math font encodings
What exactly should go here ? I would think of a table
showing what glyph groups come from what fonts, where
the text fonts come into play, etc. Plus a list of
the major disadvantages of the old encodings (this could
be taken from Justins paper).
> \item Outline of the new math font encodings
> \item Design goals and order of priorities
This could perhaps be lifted more or less directly
from Justins paper ?
> \item Details on the indvidual font tables
> \item Discussion and open questions
There is a list of pros and cons in Justins paper. Is this
the kind of stuff you expect here ?
> \item Appendix: Snapshot of the font tables