[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk***Subject**:**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts****From**:*Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>***Date**: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 15:00:43 +0200

Thierry Bouche: > PS there are no differences between bakoma & bsr names. it is true > that the names are coherent. i remembered some incoherences on harpoon > names or hook arrows between the fontinst names, indeed, not between > font sets. the y&y arrowhookleft is called hookrightchar in oml.etx, > also arrowlefttophal is called harpoonleftup. One could dream of a > setup with normalized names for usual glyphs _and_ normalized > corresponding TeX macros like \matharrowlefttophal (which is currently > \leftharpoonup: yet another name!) I suppose it might be a good idea to revise the OML/OMS/MSAM/MSBM.etx files so that the symbol names match those in the .afm files, except perhaps in cases where there is a good reason for the discrepencies, such as for `Upsilon' vs. `Upsilon1' or `A' vs. `Acal' vs. `Abbb'. As for the TeX control sequences, the need for backwards compatibility obviously mandates keeping whatever we already have. However, there's nothing to stop you from introducing additional alias names, provided your TeX is big enough that you won't run out of the hash table entries. Cheers, Ulrik.

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Next by Date:
**defining the script sizes via font dimens** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Next by thread:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Index(es):