[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*"Y&Y, Inc." <support@YandY.com>***Subject**:**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts****From**:*Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>***Date**: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 14:36:48 +0200 (MET DST)**Cc**:*Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>, Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>, math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk*

Concernant « Re: Mathematica symbol fonts », Y&Y, Inc. écrit : > >Does the unicode glyph registry help? > > I don't think so. One reason is that is it *not* a glyph registry, > but a *character* registry. Another its that UNICODE does sure, i was referencing to some iso standard with same id as unicode, but offset by 10, which is a 32 bit registry of _glyphs_. Maybe is it called AFII? i suppose MathML relies more or less on that one fo math entities? Thierry Bouche. ----- thierry.bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~bouche/ PS there are no differences between bakoma & bsr names. it is true that the names are coherent. i remembered some incoherences on harpoon names or hook arrows between the fontinst names, indeed, not between font sets. the y&y arrowhookleft is called hookrightchar in oml.etx, also arrowlefttophal is called harpoonleftup. One could dream of a setup with normalized names for usual glyphs _and_ normalized corresponding TeX macros like \matharrowlefttophal (which is currently \leftharpoonup: yet another name!)

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Next by thread:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Index(es):