[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*"Y&Y, Inc." <support@YandY.com>***Subject**:**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts****From**:*Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>***Date**: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 09:32:41 +0200 (MET DST)**Cc**:*Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>, math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk*

Concernant « Re: Mathematica symbol fonts », Y&Y, Inc. écrit : > >I have started experimenting with these fonts, but it takes time > >to write suitable .etx files. Since the AFM files do not tell > >the symbol names, they are unfortunately not usuable directly. > > Isn' that annoying! Of course the versions that Y&Y made for them > did have mnemonic symbol names in them :-) When working on MathPi, I found that it was better to first edit the AFM file to give proper names to the glyhs than hacking once more the fontinst-encoding... However, is there any standard for the glyph names that will end up in M* encodings? I'm not even sure that the various type 1 versions of CM, lucida or symbol agree. Does the unicode glyph registry help? Where do the fontinst names for OM* encodings? Thierry Bouche. ----- thierry.bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~bouche/

- Prev by Date:
**Rounding problems** - Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Next by thread:
**Re: Mathematica symbol fonts** - Index(es):