[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mathematica symbol fonts
- To: "Y&Y, Inc." <support@YandY.com>
- Subject: Re: Mathematica symbol fonts
- From: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 09:32:41 +0200 (MET DST)
- Cc: Ulrik Vieth <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
Concernant « Re: Mathematica symbol fonts », Y&Y, Inc. écrit :
> >I have started experimenting with these fonts, but it takes time
> >to write suitable .etx files. Since the AFM files do not tell
> >the symbol names, they are unfortunately not usuable directly.
> Isn' that annoying! Of course the versions that Y&Y made for them
> did have mnemonic symbol names in them :-)
When working on MathPi, I found that it was better to first edit the
AFM file to give proper names to the glyhs than hacking once
more the fontinst-encoding...
However, is there any standard for the glyph names that will end up in
M* encodings? I'm not even sure that the various type 1 versions of
CM, lucida or symbol agree. Does the unicode glyph registry help?
Where do the fontinst names for OM* encodings?
Thierry Bouche. ----- email@example.com