[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>***Subject**:**Re: MathML****From**:*Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>***Date**: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 16:34:07 +0200**Cc**:*Math Font Discuss <math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk>*

At 14:42 +0200 97/10/07, Ulrik Vieth wrote: >> I suggest readers of this group to have a look at the MathML protocol >> <http://www.w3.org/>: > >I think I've already pointed this out some time back, but thanks for the >reminder anyway. It appeared inside discussions in the LaTeX3 mailing list in June and this month, but I wanted to get the attention of "laymen" that may read these groups, and in this group especially for the following: >Anyway, it would be nice if someone could find the time to do a >detailed comparison of both, particularly >- what kinds of symbols are in MathML and Unicode that we don't have >- what kinds of symbols do we have, that don't existing elsewhere >- what kinds of symbols have been proposed, that don't exist anywhere Because I figure the gaps will be discovered by people checking if "their" stuff is there. (See <http://www.unicode.org/Unicode.charts/> for rendering of Unicode characters.) Hans Aberg * AMS member: Listing <http://www.ams.org/cml/> * Email: Hans Aberg <haberg@member.ams.org>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: MathML** - Next by Date:
**Re: MathML** - Prev by thread:
**Re: MathML** - Next by thread:
**Re: MathML** - Index(es):