[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS2 Addenda
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: MS2 Addenda
- From: Joerg.Knappen@uni-mainz.de
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 20:08:56 +0100
> \doteq is in MSP in my implementation right now - it is constructed
> in fontmath.ltx, so it should be in the first four families, or not ?
Indeed, allthough the idea of grouping is also nice.
> Right now there is \barwedge and \veebar, so if we add \barvee,
> what about \wedgebar, if only for completeness ?
Completeness seems to be the only argument in favour of \wedgebar, I have
no attestation of its actual use.