[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More missing glyphs ...
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: More missing glyphs ...
- From: email@example.com (Hans Aberg)
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 14:38:58 +0200
Matthias Clasen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>Oh, there is one pair of glyphs I forgot: If I remember correctly,
>Justin considered \lozenge and \diamond to be the same symbols. Is
>that really true, they look quite different to me (the one being square,
>while the other is horizontally squeezed).
The \diamond is listed as a binary operator, whereas the \lozenge is
listed as a miscellaneous symbol, so these have different intended use, and
the different design seems to reflect that.
One can also note the subtle differences between \lozenge and \diamondsuit.
-- Perhaps one should try to get a compiled list with the symbols intended,
or typical, use.