[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternatives to LaTeX
- To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Subject: Re: Alternatives to LaTeX
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 09:22:28 +0100
- Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
> When using PS fonts directly in Textures, I think there will be an
> encoding problem. At least for math fonts, you could not hope just using
sure, you have to address encoding. so what? its been done.
> discussed here. One can convert PS font metric to TeX font metric, but TeX
> can have more glyphs in a font, which allows for more kerning information,
> for example.
this is, excuse me, a meaningless sentence. TeX can see no more glyphs
in a font than it has...
> >it depends how i set it up!
> So the problem is that it is a lot of work setting it up.