[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)
- To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Subject: Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)
- From: Hans Aberg <haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 20:46:16 +0200
- Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
At 16:36 97-04-16, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
>what it proves is that there isn't yet a successor to TeX that people
>use to replace TeX on a large scale and as long as this is the case
>development for a successor only, doesn't solve problems for them.
For this to work, there must be a body that issues TeX upgrades, which
are suffiently conservative that the many TeX implementations only need to
flip in the new source code, I think.
Hans Aberg