[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*vieth@convex.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de***Subject**:**Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)****From**:*alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)***Date**: Tue, 12 Apr 94 16:58 BST**Cc**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk*

>(Besides, is there any recommended way to undeclare math symbol fonts? >I could hack the allocation counter and \let symbol fonts to \undefined, >but is this OK or would it leave some internal NFSS tables cluttered up?) At the moment, there's no way to re-allocate a math symbol font. This would be quite tricky, since it would require changing how NFSS allocates family numbers. But I'm sure if you were to write a package to do it, and put it in latex/contrib/supported, it would be used! >P.S. Alan: would it be possible to add a reply-to field to the mailing >list address before any reply-to fields coming from the sender? I'll pass this on to the postmaster. Alan.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)***From:*Frank Jensen <fj@iesd.auc.dk>

**References**:**Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)***From:*vieth@convex.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de (Ulrik Vieth)

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)** - Next by Date:
**Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)** - Next by thread:
**Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)** - Index(es):