[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the sim family
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: the sim family
- From: Justin Ziegler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 14:22:31 +0000
In message <745589800.54786.BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG> you write:
> "different from the others":
> \item MSAM'166, backsim
> \item MSAM'167, backsimeq
>design mistake? definitely not! the "back" in the names should
>be a clue -- the similar signs are deliberately reversed.
I had noticed that, but:
>i agree that the similars should be nice and shapely. anyone
>who's tried to do this will realize it's not all that easy.
>i do think that more than one person was involved in creating
>anyhow, these shapes are not/should not be geometrics.
This nearly answers my problem.
If you look at for instance msbm'022 and msam'056 one has a geometric
tilde, and the other has a shapee like tilde. I guess that is a mistake
due to the fact that more than one preson were involved.