next up previous
Next: Feedback #15 Up: Questionnaire Previous: Feedback #13

Feedback #14

Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:25:36 -0500
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 			TUG2003 QUESTIONNAIRE
> 			 tug2003-pr@tug.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --------ABOUT THE CONFERENCE:
>
> 1)	WAS THE LOCATION FOR THE CONFERENCE INTERESTING?

Great spot, but probably too expensive for some. I was
OK since I was funded for the trip. 

> 2)	WERE THE TOPICS COVERED OF INTEREST TO YOU?
>

For sure. I really enjoyed the week.

> 3)	LIST THE TALKS/SUBJECTS THAT WERE THE MOST VALUABLE TO YOU.
>

The material on web services and presentation packages were
those I thought were most valuable.

>
> 4)	LIST THE TALKS/SUBJECTS THAT WERE THE LEAST VALUABLE TO YOU.
>

I enjoyed the morning devoted to TeXshop, but since I don't use
Macs, it was less valuable to me personally.

>
>
> --------INTERNET CONNCECTIONS
>
> 5)	WERE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE INTERNET ACCESS PROVIDED?
>

Yes.

>
>
> 6)	WAS IT HELPFUL TO HAVE THE iBOOKS AVAILABLE AT THE  WORKSHOPS
> 	AND FOR EMAIL ACCESS?
>

Yes.

>
>
> --------ACCOMMODATION AND TRANSPORTATION:
>
> 7)	DID YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH HOTEL ACCOMMODATION?
>
No.

>
> 8)	WERE HOTEL CHARGES AS YOU EXPECTED?
>

No. There was an unexpected $5 porterage fee. When I brought
this to the attention of the staff at the desk, they
rescinded it.

>
>
> 9)	DID YOU HAVE PROBLEMS WITH TRANSPORTATION?
>

No. Setting up the web site with info for people arriving
at the same time was a great idea.

>
> --------HOW COULD CONFERENCES BE BETTER ORGANIZED:
>
> 10)	COMMENTS?
>
>
> --------OTHER:
>
> 11)	REMARKS
>
>
>

I'm really glad you avoided parallel sessions. It made for
long days, but I didn't miss any of the talks I was interested
in.

>
>
>
>
> --------SIGNATURE: 
>