[XeTeX] Memoir class font problem

Nicolas Vaughan nivaca at gmail.com
Sun Jun 14 20:11:48 CEST 2009


>
> You know what they say: "de gustibus non est disputandum" which those of
> different tastes have mutilated to say "disgustibus non est disputandum".If
> you're interested, I can send you (off-list) the complete work (just over
> 500 pages).

I agree. And, as Lucretius adds, "floriferis ut apes in saltibus omnia
libant".


> Of course, I may have to work on it some if we get this figured out!
>
I would love to, thanks!!!

Best wishesm

Nicolas


On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Fr. Michael Gilmary <
FrMichaelGilmary at maronitemonks.org> wrote:

> Nicolas Vaughan wrote:
>
>  Sorry, it worked fine. I had to change the second header definition.
>> Why do you define it twice, on lines 18--22 and on lines 65-70?
>>
>
> It's an old file ... and I cut it up to get the example. No doubt, there
> are scraps of all kinds of things left in there!
>
> If I remember correctly, the first def of ruled pagestyle is for the Index
> ( = latin for toc), which is defined somewhere inside with a header style I
> didn't like for some reason. In fact, I don't think I ever got it to work
> anyway! So, it can be safely removed.
>
>
>  PS I Iiked you dypthongs.
>>
>
>
>
> If you're interested, I can send you (off-list) the complete work (just
> over 500 pages). Of course, I may have to work on it some if we get this
> figured out!
>
>
>
> --
> United in adoration of Jesus,
>
>
> fr. michael gilmary, mma
>
> Most Holy Trinity Monastery
> 67 Dugway Road
> Petersham, MA 01366-9725
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20090614/4cd751af/attachment.html>


More information about the XeTeX mailing list