[Tugindia] clarification on edef
Baskaran.K
tugindia@tug.org
Sat, 11 Jan 2003 09:51:11 +0530
Dear sir,
Thanks.
This is the best method.
It will reduce the definition of counter etc.
Thanks for your suggestion
Regards
baskaran nk
-----Original Message-----
From: David Kastrup [mailto:dak@gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:36 PM
To: tugindia@tug.org
Subject: Re: [Tugindia] clarification on edef
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> "Baskaran.K" <baskaran@sps.co.in> writes:
>
> > \newcount\aacount
> > \def\kk{}
> > \def\aa#1{\advance\aacount 1\ifnum\aacount=0\edef\kk{ \kk #1}
> > \else\edef\kk{ \kk, #1}\fi}
> > \aa{aa}
> > \aa{bb}
> > \aa{cc}
> > \aa{dd}
> > \kk
> > if you find any other good method, Kindly help me.
>
> \def\kk{}
> \def\aa#1{\edef\kk{\kk\ifx\kk\empty , \fi #1}}
Oops, I mean
\def\aa#1{\edef\kk{\kk\ifx\kk\empty\else , \fi#1}}
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
Home: http://www.tug.org.in/
unsubscribe: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tugindia