[texhax] Weirder and weirder
uwe.lueck at web.de
Tue Aug 17 10:53:47 CEST 2010
Richard Davies <richard at tollyboy.demon.co.uk>, 17.08.2010 01:32:21
>On 16/08/10 22:27, Michael Doob wrote:
>> On Monday 16 August 2010 4:14 pm, Michael Barr wrote:
>>> In connection with the question I raised about revtex a couple days ago, I
>>> would ask texhaxxers to explain the following behaviour, which has nothing
>>> to do with revtex. First, examine the following and try to predict the
>>> results. Then run it and see the actual ones.
>Seems to compile OK on my box.
>log file looks normal.
>Produces no pages of output I guess because it is a completely empty
I think the OP is still wondering at which .tex lines TeX replaces \nullfont by the font acting in typesetting. I didn't remember well myself, but the OP's .log indicates that the \textfont's (TeXbook p. 153) are chosen at the first $, which triggers LaTeX's \check at mathfonts.
More information about the texhax