[texhax] Regarding margin for binding in thesis

Arvind bahuroopi at gmail.com
Sat Apr 24 15:49:48 CEST 2010


Hello Torsten,

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Torsten Wagner
<torsten.wagner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Arvind,
>
> sorry for my late reply, I was absent for the last two days.

Same here - was busy finishing the thesis, and then busy submitting it.

>> I do not follow your argument. For a moment, ignore what happens in
>> the middle, in the "2 page view". The way you showed the schematic in
>> your first mail, the left margin of page 2 and right margin of page 3
>> are of unequal length. Shouldn't they be of the same width by your own
>> argument, and the schematic you plotted? (For that matter, the middle
>> length is also not satisfactory - and yes, i did check by taking
>> printouts of two pages, and placing them in a "2 page view".)
>
> I do not know what happend to the schematic during the mail process.
> However, it was intended to depict the same length for the left margin of
> page 2 and the right margin of page 3.

You did indicate the same length for both left and right margins, in
the schematic in your earlier mail. And i understood it that way. But
you assumed, *incorrectly*, that the geometry package was giving the
same left and right margins for me, and i was complaining about that.
The geometry package was NOT doing that. When provided with the
twoside option, it was giving a longer right margin, and shorter left
margin, for all pages. I was complaining about that.

After going through the entire geometry manual carefully, it is clear
to me why that happened. When provided with the twoside option, the
geometry package provides a 2:3 ratio of left to right margins.
Technically,

marginratio={2:3, 2:3}

where the first number denotes the horizontal margin ratio, and the
second, the vertical margin ratio.

Hence i was getting the right margin longer. I do not know the logic
behind this ratio. Hope this helps someone who turns to this thread
with the same doubt. I should have carefully read the manual earlier,
but i was hard pressed for time.

As for my thesis, i chucked the geometry package, and set about
adjusting the margins using \oddsidemargin, \evensidemargin and
\textwidth.

> Please find below a more detailed explanation:
>
> Lets give numbers to the margins to avoid confusion:
>
>    1           2   3           4
> |------| Text |---*---| Text |------|
> * indicate the later book-middle.
> An example would be
> if margin 1 and margin 4 are 1.5 inch
> then margin 2 and margin 3 are 0.75 inch which gives together 1.5 inch.
>
> As mentioned later by Alan, the rule I like to describe might be different
> from major to major or from country to country. So fare it was the only rule
> I know. Thanks to Alan to widen my view.
> The rule I follow is rather nearly as old as book printing itself [1], I was
> always pleased with the result.
>
> My respond to your request was just to make sure that you are not
> misunderstood that margins 2 and 3 smaller even after adding binding
> corrections. This was what happen to me when I came the first time along
> this. Thus, to say, even with binding correction margin 2 and 3 might still
> be smaller then margin 1 and 4.
>
> Hope now my intention is more clear.

As i explained above, i understood what you were saying, and i do
agree with you. Only you misunderstood what i was complaining about,
and i was trying to clarify that. I was complaining about margins 1
and 4 being unequal on all pages. Maybe i did not express it very
clearly the first time. Hope it is clear now.

Thanks for the reference and all the help.

regards,
arvind



More information about the texhax mailing list